Double-blind Treatment Period Research Articles

Additional Results from Two Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trials of Stiripentol in Dravet Syndrome Highlight a Rapid Antiseizure Efficacy with Longer Seizure-Free Periods.

The efficacy of stiripentol in Dravet syndrome children was evidenced in two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 studies, namely STICLO France (October 1996-August 1998) and STICLO Italy (April 1999-October 2000), but data were not fully exploited at the time. This post-hoc analysis used additional information, notably collected during the open-label extension (OLE) month, or reported by caregivers in individual diaries, to evaluate new outcomes. Overall, 64 patients were included (31 in the placebo group, 33 in the stiripentol group) of whom 34 (53.1%) were female. Patients' mean and median (25%; 75%) age were 9.2years (range 3.0-20.7years) and 8.7years (6.0; 12.1) respectively. At the end of the double-blind treatment period, 72% of the patients in the stiripentol group had a≥50% decrease in generalized tonic-clonic seizure (GTCS) frequency, versus 7% in the placebo group (P<0.001), 56% had a profound (≥75%) decrease versus 3% in the placebo group (P<0.001), and 38% were free of GTCS, but none in the placebo group (P<0.001). The onset of stiripentol efficacy was rapid, significant from the fourth day of treatment onwards. The median longest period of consecutive days with no GTCS was 32days in the stiripentol group compared to 8.5days in the placebo group (P<0.001). Further to the switch to the third month OLE, an 80.2% decrease in seizure frequency from baseline was observed in patients previously receiving placebo, while no change in efficacy was observed in those already on stiripentol. Adverse events were more frequent in the stiripentol group, with significantly more episodes of somnolence, anorexia, and weight decrease than in the placebo group. Altogether these new analyses of the STICLO data reinforce the evidence for a remarkable efficacy of stiripentol in Dravet syndrome, with a demonstrated rapid onset of action and sustained response, as also evidenced in further post-randomized trials.

Safety and efficacy of once-daily dexfadrostat phosphate in patients with primary aldosteronism: a randomised, parallel group, multicentre, phase 2 trial

Primary aldosteronism (PA) is caused by autonomous aldosterone overproduction and characterised by uncontrolled hypertension. There are currently no treatments that targetaldosterone synthesis. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of a novel aldosterone synthase inhibitor, dexfadrostat phosphate, in patients with PA. This multi-centre, randomised, phase 2 trial was conducted between November 2019 and May 2022 (NCT04007406; EudraCT code 2019-000919-85). Adults with PA and an office systolic blood pressure of 145-190mmHg were included. After a 2-week single-blind placebo run-in period, participants were randomised 1:1:1 to receive oral dexfadrostat phosphate 4, 8, or 12mg once daily for an 8-week double-blind treatment period, followed by a 2-week single-blind placebo withdrawal period. Randomisation was conducted centrally and stratified by centre and sex. At the beginning and end of the treatment period, 24h ambulatory systolic blood pressure (aSBP) was recorded. Blood samples were taken every 2 weeks. Primary endpoints were the change in aldosterone-to-renin ratio (ARR) and mean 24h aSBP from baseline to the end of the treatment period in the combined dose group of all participants receiving any dose of dexfadrostat phosphate. Safety endpoints were the occurrence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious adverse events over the entire study in all randomised participants who received at least one dose of dexfadrostat phosphate. In total, 35 participants received dexfadrostat phosphate and all participants completed the study. Twenty-six participants (74.3%) were male, the mean age was 51.9 years (SD 8.7), and most were White (n=32, 91.4%). The median ARR and the mean 24h aSBP significantly decreased from the beginning to the end of the treatment period in the combined dose group (ARR: 15.3 vs 0.6, least-squares mean [LSM] change in log-normal values-2.5, p<0.0001; aSBP: 142.6 vs 131.9mmHg, LSM change-10.7mmHg, p<0.0001). There were no safety concerns; all TEAEs were mild or moderate and there were no serious TEAEs. Dexfadrostat phosphate corrected the ARR and aSBP and was well tolerated in patients with PA, demonstrating the benefit of pharmacologically targeting the source of hyperaldosteronism. DAMIAN Pharma AG.

P163 Low uveitis rates in patients with axial spondyloarthritis treated with bimekizumab: pooled results from phase 2b/3 trials

Abstract Background/Aims Acute anterior uveitis (‘uveitis’) is a common extra musculoskeletal manifestation of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). Interleukin (IL)-17 has been implicated in uveitis pathogenesis; however, inhibition of IL-17A alone may not be optimal for uveitis management. We report the incidence of uveitis following IL-17A and IL17F inhibition with bimekizumab (BKZ) in patients with axSpA. Methods Data were pooled for patients randomised to placebo (PBO) or BKZ 160mg every 4 weeks (Q4W) in the double-blind treatment period (DBTP) of the phase (ph)3 studies BE MOBILE 1 (NCT03928704; non-radiographic axSpA) and 2 (NCT03928743; radiographic axSpA [i.e. ankylosing spondylitis]). Data were also pooled for all patients treated with BKZ in BE MOBILE 1, BE MOBILE 2, BE MOVING (NCT04436640; open-label extension [OLE] of BE MOBILE 1 and 2), the ph2b study BE AGILE (NCT02963506; r-axSpA) and its OLE BE AGILE 2 (NCT03355573; data cut-off 4 July 2022). Uveitis events were identified using the preferred terms “autoimmune uveitis,” “iridocyclitis,” “iritis” and “uveitis,” and are reported as exposure adjusted incidence rates (EAIRs) per 100 patient-years (PY) for all patients who received ≥1 BKZ dose. Results Baseline characteristics of the axSpA study populations are shown in the Table. In the DBTP of BE MOBILE 1 and 2, uveitis events occurred in 11/237 (4.6%; EAIR/100 PY [95% CI]: 15.4 [7.7, 27.5]) and 2/349 (0.6%; 1.8 [0.2, 6.7]) patients randomised to PBO and BKZ (percentage difference [95% CI]: 4.1 [1.7, 7.6]), respectively. In 45 PBO-randomised (19.0%) and 52 BKZ-randomised (14.9%) patients with history of uveitis, uveitis occurred in 20.0% (EAIR/100 PY [95% CI]: 70.4 [32.2, 133.7]) and 1.9% (6.2 [0.2, 34.8]) of patients, respectively. In the ph2b/3 pool (N = 848) total BKZ exposure was 2,034.4 PY and 130 (15.3%) patients had history of uveitis. Uveitis occurred in 25 (2.9%; EAIR/100 PY [95% CI]: 1.2 [0.8, 1.8]) and 14 (10.8%; 4.6 [2.5, 7.7]) patients overall and with history of uveitis, respectively. All uveitis events were mild/moderate; one led to discontinuation. Conclusion Incidence of uveitis was lower to Week 16 in patients with axSpA randomised to BKZ 160mg Q4W versus PBO and remained low at 1.2/100 PY in the largest ph2b/3 pool. Disclosure M. Rudwaleit: Consultancies; AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Novartis and UCB Pharma. Member of speakers’ bureau; AbbVie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chugai, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB Pharma. M.A. Brown: Consultancies; Clementia, Grey Wolf Therapeutics, Incyte, Ipsen, Pfizer, Regeneron and Xinthera. Member of speakers’ bureau; Novartis and Pfizer. Grants/research support; UCB Pharma. F. van Gaalen: Grants/research support; Jacobus Stichting, Novartis, Stichting ASAS, Stichting Vrienden van Sole Mio and UCB Pharma. Other; fees from Novartis; personal fees from AbbVie, BMS, Eli Lilly and MSD. N. Haroon: Consultancies; AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis and UCB Pharma. L.S. Gensler: Consultancies; AbbVie, Acelyrin, Eli Lilly, Fresenius Kabi, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB Pharma. Grants/research support; Novartis and UCB Pharma paid to institution. C. Fleurinck: Other; Employee of UCB Pharma. A. Marten: Other; Employee of UCB Pharma. U. Massow: Other; Employee of UCB Pharma. N. de Peyrecave: Other; Employee of UCB Pharma. T. Vaux: Other; Employee of UCB Pharma. K. White: Shareholder/stock ownership; UCB Pharma. Other; Employee of UCB Pharma. A. Deodhar: Consultancies; AbbVie, BMS, Eli Lilly, Janssen, MoonLake, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB Pharma. Member of speakers’ bureau; Janssen, Novartis and Pfizer. Grants/research support; AbbVie, BMS, Celgene, Eli Lilly, MoonLake, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB Pharma. D. McGonagle: Consultancies; AbbVie, Celgene, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB Pharma. Honoraria; AbbVie, Celgene, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB Pharma. Member of speakers’ bureau; AbbVie, Celgene, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB Pharma. Grants/research support; AbbVie, Celgene, Janssen, Merck and Pfizer. I. van der Horst-Bruinsma: Consultancies; Abbvie, Eli Lilly, MSD, Novartis and UCB Pharma. Other; unrestricted grants received for investigator-initiated studies from AbbVie, MSD, Pfizer and UCB Pharma; fees received for lectures from AbbVie, BMS, MSD and Pfizer.

Efficacy and safety of adjunctive cenobamate based on patient etiology: Post-hoc analysis of YKP3089C017 randomized clinical trial

IntroductionAdjunctive cenobamate was effective and safe for the treatment of uncontrolled focal onset seizures in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 study (YKP3089C017; NCT01866111). This post-hoc analysis assessed the efficacy of adjunctive cenobamate in the treatment of patients with different epileptic etiologies during the study. MethodsAdult patients with uncontrolled focal seizures who previously received 1 to 3 antiseizure medications (ASMs) were randomly assigned in a ratio of 1:1:1:1 to receive placebo or cenobamate 100, 200 or 400 mg/day. Patients were further stratified based on their etiologic causes as genetic/presumed genetic, unknown cause, structural cause, and not reported (NR) groups. The frequency per 28 days for an 18-week double-blind treatment period, responder rates (≥50 %, ≥75 %, ≥90 %, and 100 %) during the maintenance phase (12 weeks), and safety were assessed. ResultsA total of 394 patients were categorized into the genetic/presumed genetic (n = 9; 2.28 %), unknown cause (n = 199; 50.51 %), structural cause (n = 177; 44.92 %), and NR (n = 13; 3.30 %) groups, with 4 patients were classified into either of the two etiological causes each. The baseline characteristics were comparable. The percentage of reduction in seizure frequency per 28 days was significantly higher in the cenobamate-treated structural (p = 0.01) and unknown cause (p = 0.0003) groups compared with the placebo group. Responder rates of ≥50 %, ≥75 %, ≥90 %, and 100 % were also higher with cenobamate therapy. Notably, no serious treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were observed in the genetic/presumed genetic group treated with cenobamate. The most common TEAEs (≥10 %) occurring in patients treated with cenobamate were nervous system disorders by system organ class, and somnolence was the most commonly reported TEAE. ConclusionCenobamate reduces seizures in adult patients previously treated with ASMs, with high responder rates and acceptable safety, regardless of underlying causes.

Cariprazine as a maintenance therapy in the prevention of mood episodes in adults with bipolar I disorder.

Cariprazine treats acute manic and depressive episodes in bipolar I disorder (BP-I), but its efficacy in preventing relapse of mood episode remains unknown. In this phase 3b, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, patients with BP-I with acute manic or depressive episodes (each with/without mixed features), were treated with cariprazine 3.0 mg/day during a 16-week open-label treatment period; those who achieved stable remission within 8 weeks and remained stable for at least another 8 weeks were randomized to receive cariprazine 1.5 or 3.0 mg per day or placebo in the double-blind treatment period for up to 39 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was time to relapse of any mood episode. Adverse events (AEs) were assessed. Patients (440/896) enrolled in the open-label treatment period achieved stability criteria and were randomized to receive cariprazine 3.0 mg/day (n = 148), cariprazine 1.5 mg/day (n = 147), or placebo (n = 145) in the double-blind treatment period. Relapse rates were 17.9%, 16.8%, and 19.7% in the cariprazine 3.0 mg/day, cariprazine 1.5 mg/day, and placebo groups, respectively. Neither dose of cariprazine was more effective than placebo on the primary outcome (3.0 mg/day: HR = 0.89, [95% CI: 0.5, 1.5]; 1.5 mg/day: HR = 0.83, 95% CI [0.5, 1.4]). The most frequently reported AEs (≥5%) were akathisia, headache, insomnia, and nausea in the open-label treatment period and increased weight and insomnia in the double-blind treatment period. In the open-label and double-blind treatment periods, 7.5% and 1.6% of patients experienced an AE leading to discontinuation. Cariprazine was not superior to placebo in the prevention of relapses in this study. Relapse rates were unusually low in the placebo group. Cariprazine was well-tolerated.

Transcranial alternating current stimulation improves quality of life in Parkinson’s disease: study protocol for a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial

BackgroundThe neural cells in the brains of patients with Parkinson’s disease (PWP) display aberrant synchronized oscillatory activity within the beta frequency range. Additionally, enhanced gamma oscillations may serve as a compensatory mechanism for motor inhibition mediated by beta activity and also reinstate plasticity in the primary motor cortex affected by Parkinson’s disease. Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) can synchronize endogenous oscillations with exogenous rhythms, thereby modulating cortical activity. The objective of this study is to investigate whether the addition of tACS to multidisciplinary intensive rehabilitation treatment (MIRT) can improve symptoms of PWP so as to enhance the quality of life in individuals with Parkinson’s disease based on the central-peripheral-central theory.MethodsThe present study was a randomized, double-blind trial that enrolled 60 individuals with Parkinson’s disease aged between 45 and 70 years, who had Hoehn-Yahr scale scores ranging from 1 to 3. Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either the tACS + MIRT group or the sham-tACS + MIRT group. The trial consisted of a two-week double-blind treatment period followed by a 24-week follow-up period, resulting in a total duration of twenty-six weeks. The primary outcome measured the change in PDQ-39 scores from baseline (T0) to 4 weeks (T2), 12 weeks (T3), and 24 weeks (T4) after completion of the intervention. The secondary outcome assessed changes in MDS-UPDRS III scores at T0, the end of intervention (T1), T2, T3, and T4. Additional clinical assessments and mechanistic studies were conducted as tertiary outcomes.DiscussionThe objective of this study is to demonstrate that tACS can enhance overall functionality and improve quality of life in PWP, based on the framework of MIRT. Additionally, it seeks to establish a potential correlation between these therapeutic effects and neuroplasticity alterations in relevant brain regions. The efficacy of tACS will be assessed during the follow-up period in order to optimize neuroplasticity and enhance its potential impact on rehabilitation efficiency for PWP.Trial registrationChinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2300071969. Registered on 30 May 2023.

A 52-week efficacy and safety study of enavogliflozin versus dapagliflozin as an add-on to metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: ENHANCE-M extension study.

To evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of enavogliflozin 0.3 mg/day added to metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. After 24 weeks of a randomized, double-blind treatment period with enavogliflozin 0.3 mg/day (n = 101) or dapagliflozin 10 mg/day (n = 99) added to metformin, all patients received enavogliflozin 0.3 mg/day plus metformin for an additional 28 weeks during the open-label extension period. Eighty-two patients continued enavogliflozin (maintenance group), and 77 were switched from dapagliflozin to enavogliflozin (switch group). All adverse drug reactions (ADR) were mild in severity. In the maintenance group, ADRs (cystitis and vaginal infection) were reported in two patients (2.44%) during 52 weeks. In the switch group, ADR (hypoglycaemia) was reported in one patient (1.30%) during a 28-week open-label extension period. At week 52, glycated haemoglobin and fasting plasma glucose were significantly lower than at the baseline, by 0.85% and 29.08 mg/dl, respectively, in the maintenance group (p < .0001 for both), and by 0.81% and 32.77 mg/dl, respectively, in the switch group (p < .0001 for both). At week 52, 68.92% of patients from the maintenance group and 64.29% from the switch group achieved glycated haemoglobin <7%. A significant increase in the urine glucose-creatinine ratio was observed at week 52, by 58.81 g/g and 63.77 g/g in the maintenance and switch groups, respectively (p < .0001). Enavogliflozin added to metformin was tolerated well for up to 52 weeks and provided continual glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes mellitus, along with a significant increase in the urine glucose-creatinine ratio.

(123) Preliminary Efficacy of Sildenafil Cream, 3.6% in an Exploratory, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 2b Trial for the Treatment of Female Sexual Arousal Disorder

Abstract Introduction Female sexual arousal disorder (FSAD) is a persistent or recurrent inability to attain, or to maintain until completion of the sexual activity, an adequate lubrication-swelling response of sexual excitement that causes marked distress or interpersonal difficulty. The biologic mechanisms leading to FSAD are similar to male erectile dysfunction. Objective To test the preliminary efficacy of topical Sildenafil Cream, 3.6% among women with FSAD in a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, exploratory Phase 2b study. To describe, using validated 28-day recall instruments, changes in sexual function with treatment, and to validate exploratory sexual function questionnaires in a placebo-controlled trial. Methods Healthy pre-menopausal women, aged 18-years or older and their sexual partners, if applicable, were screened and provided written informed consent. An individual clinical interview with each volunteer was conducted in order to establish that FSAD was present and was the primary sexual dysfunction concern. Women at risk of pregnancy used effective contraception during the study. Women or their partners were excluded if they had un-controlled hypertension, a history of serious cardiac events (e.g. myocardial infarction, stroke), orthostatic hypotension or other serious medical co-morbidities. The co-primary efficacy endpoints were measured by the arousal sensation domain of the sexual function questionnaire (SFQ28) and question 14 of the female sexual distress scale (FSDS). After a one-month, no drug, run-in period, and a one-month, single-blind placebo, run-in period, 200 eligible women were randomized to receive Sildenafil Cream, 3.6% (n=101) versus placebo cream (n=99). Participants applied 2 grams of the investigational product to the clitoris, vestibule, labia minora and anterior distal vagina 10 – 20 minutes prior to each partnered or un-partnered sexual experience. During the 12-week, double-blind treatment period, participants were seen monthly and completed validated, 28-day recall questionnaires. Efficacy was also measured by a 12-question Arousal Diary (AD), completed within 24 hours of each sexual experience. Results Volunteers (n=833) underwent informed consent in this ethics board (Advarra Pro 00049161) and U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved study (IND 119922), registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (#NCT04948151). There were 1131 Sildenafil and 951 placebo exposed sexual experiences recorded in the AD during the double-blind treatment period. Sildenafil Cream, 3.6% treated women had a higher proportion of satisfactory sexual events than placebo users. At 12-weeks of use, there was improvement in the co-primary endpoint of arousal sensation consistent with how women reported meaningful improvement in an exit interview at the end of the study, although this did not achieve statistical significance. Sildenafil Cream, 3.6% treated women showed improvements in pre-specified exploratory endpoints that evaluated various aspects of the sexual experience including desire (p=0.02), arousal lubrication (p = 0.059) and orgasm (p=0.066) after 8 weeks of product use. Conclusions Data from this exploratory, placebo-controlled study of topical Sildenafil Cream, 3.6% for the treatment of FSAD in healthy premenopausal women support further clinical development of this first potential treatment for FSAD. Disclosure Yes, this is sponsored by industry/sponsor: Dare Bioscience and Strategic Sciences and Technologies (SST), LLC. Clarification: Industry initiated, executed and funded study. Any of the authors act as a consultant, employee or shareholder of an industry for: Dare Bioscience and SST LLC.

Anti-thymic stromal lymphopoietin monoclonal antibody in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (DUBHE): Rationale and design of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) has a complex pathogenesis and is difficult to treat, which brings a huge economic burden to society. Despite all the progress in the treatment of CRSwNP, some patients with CRSwNP still experience recurrence. Therefore, there is an urgent need to develop novel drugs and treatments for CRSwNP. Thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP) is produced by epithelial cells and mediates type 2 and nontype 2 inflammation through various downstream cellular immune and inflammatory pathways. Anti-TSLP treatment with tezepelumab has been proven to be effective in treating patients with uncontrolled asthma, regardless of their peripheral blood eosinophil levels being low or high. However, there is no relevant research on the usage of anti-TSLP monoclonal antibodies for the treatment of uncontrolled CRSwNP. This is the first phase Ib/IIa study for subjects with uncontrolled CRSwNP, aiming to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, immunogenicity, and preliminary efficacy of multiple ascending doses (MAD) of anti-TSLP monoclonal antibody. The DUBHE is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase Ib/IIa clinical study. The study will be composed of 3 periods: a screening/run-in period of 4 weeks, a treatment period of 52 weeks (16 weeks of double-blind treatment period +36 weeks of open-label treatment period), and a safety follow-up period of 12 weeks. No more than 113 subjects with uncontrolled CRSwNP will be divided into 4 groups to receive different doses of CM326 or placebo treatments (55 mg every two weeks [Q2W] group, 110 mg Q2W group, 220 mg Q2W group, and 220 mg every four weeks [Q4W] group). Enrolled patients will be stratified by tissue eosinophil count (TEC). The safety of the monoclonal antibody that targets TSLP in uncontrolled CRSwNP and its preliminary efficacy at 16 weeks of treatment. In this study, for the first time, the safety and preliminary efficacy of MAD of CM326 will be verified. The efficacy of CM326 in patients with eosinophilic CRSwNP (TEC ≥55/high power field [HPF]), as well as noneosinophilic CRSwNP (TEC <55/HPF) will be testified. NCT05324137.

Efficacy and safety of mTOR inhibition in cutaneous sarcoidosis: a single-centre trial

Sarcoidosis is an inflammatory condition that can affect various organs and tissues, causing the formation of granulomas and subsequent functional impairment. The origin of sarcoidosis remains unknown and there are few treatment options. Mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) activation is commonly seen in granulomas of patients across different tissues and has been shown to induce sarcoidosis-like granulomas in a mouse model. This study aimed to examine the efficacy and safety of the mTOR inhibitor sirolimus as a treatment for cutaneous sarcoidosis. We did a single-centre, randomised study treating patients with persistent and glucocorticoid-refractory cutaneous sarcoidosis with sirolimus at the Vienna General Hospital, Medical University of Vienna (Vienna, Austria). We recruited participants who had persistent, active, and histologically proven cutaneous sarcoidosis. We used an n-of-1 crossover design in a placebo-controlled, double-blind topical treatment period and a subsequent single-arm systemic treatment phase for 4 months in the same participants. Participants initially received either 0·1% topical sirolimus in Vaseline or placebo (Vaseline alone), twice daily. After a washout period, all participants were subsequently administered a 6 mg loading dose followed by 2 mg sirolimus solution orally once daily, aiming to achieve serum concentrations of 6 ng/mL. The primary endpoint was change in the Cutaneous Sarcoidosis Activity and Morphology Index (CSAMI) after topical or systemic treatment. All participants were included in the safety analyses, and patients having completed the respective treatment period (topical treatment or systemic treatment) were included in the primary analyses. Adverse events were assessed at each study visit by clinicians and were categorised according to their correlation with the study drug, severity, seriousness, and expectedness. This study is registered with EudraCT (2017-004930-27) and is now closed. 16 participants with persistent cutaneous sarcoidosis were enrolled in the study between Sept 3, 2019, and June 15, 2021. Six (37%) of 16 participants were men, ten (63%) were women, and 15 (94%) were White. The median age of participants was 54 years (IQR 48-58). 14 participants were randomly assigned in the topical phase and 2 entered the systemic treatment phase directly. Daily topical treatment did not improve cutaneous lesions (effect estimate -1·213 [95% CI -2·505 to 0·079], p=0·066). Systemic treatment targeting trough serum concentrations of 6 ng/mL resulted in clinical and histological improvement of skin lesions in seven (70%) of ten participants (median -7·0 [95% CI -16·5 to -3·0], p=0·018). Various morphologies of cutaneous sarcoidosis, including papular, nodular, plaque, scar, and tattoo-associated sarcoidosis, responded to systemic sirolimus therapy with a long-lasting effect for more than 1 year after treatment had been stopped. There were no serious adverse events and no deaths. Short-term treatment with systemic sirolimus might be an effective and safe treatment option for patients with persistent glucocorticoid-refractory sarcoidosis with a long-lasting disease-modulating effect. The effect of sirolimus in granulomatous inflammation should be investigated further in large, multi-centre, randomised clinical trials. Vienna Science and Technology Fund, Austrian Science Fund.

Effect of avalglucosidase alfa on disease-specific and general patient-reported outcomes in treatment-naïve adults with late-onset Pompe disease compared with alglucosidase alfa: Meaningful change analyses from the Phase 3 COMET trial

BackgroundThe Phase 3 COMET trial (NCT02782741) comparing avalglucosidase alfa and alglucosidase alfa included health-related quality of life (HRQoL) assessments in treatment-naïve patients with late-onset Pompe disease (LOPD). Here, we further characterize results from disease-specific and general patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures. MethodsAdults who participated in the COMET trial receiving avalglucosidase alfa or alglucosidase alfa (both 20 mg/kg biweekly) during the 49-week double-blind treatment period were included in the analysis. Proportions of patients exceeding meaningful change thresholds at Week 49 were compared post hoc between treatment groups. PROs and their meaningful change thresholds included: Pompe Disease Severity Scale (PDSS; decrease 1.0–1.5 points), Pompe Disease Impact Scale (PDIS; decrease 1.0–1.5 points), Rasch-built Pompe-specific Activity Scale (R-PAct; change from unable to able to complete activity), 12-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12; physical component summary [PCS] score: increase ≥6 points, mental component summary [MCS] score: increase ≥7 points), EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L; improvement of ≥1 category), and Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC; any improvement). ResultsThe analysis included 99 adult patients (avalglucosidase alfa n = 50; alglucosidase alfa n = 49). Patients who received avalglucosidase alfa had significantly greater odds of achieving a meaningful change versus alglucosidase alfa for the PDSS Shortness of Breath (OR [95% CI] 11.79 [2.24; 62.18]), Fatigue/Pain (6.24 [1.20; 32.54]), Morning Headache (13.98 [1.71; 114.18]), and Overall Fatigue (5.88 [1.37; 25.11]) domains, and were significantly more likely to meet meaningful change thresholds across multiple PDSS domains (all nominal p < 0.05). A numerically greater proportion of patients in the avalglucosidase alfa group were able to complete selected activities of the R-PAct compared with the alglucosidase alfa group. Significantly greater proportions of patients who received avalglucosidase alfa achieved meaningful improvements for EQ-5D-5L usual activities dimension, EQ visual analog scale, and all four PGIC domains. The proportion of patients with improvements in SF-12 PCS and MCS was greater in the avalglucosidase alfa group versus alglucosidase alfa group, but was not significant (p > 0.05). ConclusionsThese analyses show that avalglucosidase alfa improves multiple symptoms and aspects of daily functioning, including breathing and mobility. This supports the clinical relevance of the effects of avalglucosidase alfa on HRQoL for patients with LOPD.

Fecal Microbiota, Live-jslm for the Prevention of Recurrent Clostridioides difficile Infection : Subgroup Analysis of PUNCH CD2 and PUNCH CD3.

To assess fecal microbiota, live-jslm (REBYOTA, abbreviated as RBL, formerly RBX2660) efficacy and safety in participants grouped by recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (rCDI) risk factors and treatment-related variables. RBL is the first microbiota-based live biotherapeutic approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the prevention of rCDI in adults after antibiotic treatment for rCDI. Treatment success rates across subgroups for PUNCH CD3 (NCT03244644) were estimated using a Bayesian hierarchical model, borrowing data from PUNCH CD2 (NCT02299570). Treatment-emergent adverse events were summarized for the double-blind treatment period within 8 weeks. Treatment differences between RBL and placebo at 8 weeks were similar to the total population for most subgroups. Treatment effect sizes were similar between CDI tests, higher for oral vancomycin courses >14 days versus ≤14 days and higher for antibiotic washout periods of 3 days versus ≤2 days. The largest reductions in the rate of rCDI with RBL versus placebo were observed for participants with a 3-day CDI antibiotic washout period and participants with ≥4 previous CDI episodes. Most RBL-treated participants experienced TEAEs that were mild or moderate in severity and related to preexisting conditions. This analysis provides further evidence of RBL efficacy and safety across subgroups, including those at high risk for rCDI.

Danicopan As Add-on Therapy to Ravulizumab or Eculizumab Versus Placebo in Patients with Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria and Clinically Significant Extravascular Hemolysis: Phase 3 Long-Term Data

Background C5 inhibitors eculizumab (Ecu) and ravulizumab (Rav) have transformed the natural history of paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH). Ecu resulted in patient (pt) survival comparable to that of the general population over 20 y of follow-up under real-world conditions. Overall survival rate at 6 years for pts treated with Rav was 98.4%. Where available, Rav is the standard of care for PNH, inhibiting terminal complement activation to prevent intravascular hemolysis (IVH) and thrombosis. Of pts with PNH treated with Rav/Ecu, 10-20% experience clinically significant extravascular hemolysis (cs-EVH). Efficacy and safety of the first-in-class oral factor D inhibitor danicopan (Dan; ALXN2040) as add-on treatment to Rav or Ecu for pts with PNH and cs-EVH were assessed in a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo (Pbo)-controlled superiority clinical trial (ALPHA, NCT04469465). 12-wk data (double-blind treatment period [TP] 1) showing superiority of Dan vs Pbo on primary and key secondary endpoints were previously reported and represent the final analysis set for the trial. Open-label 24-wk (TP2) and ongoing long-term extension (LTE) data are presented. Methods Pts (≥18 y) with PNH and cs-EVH (hemoglobin [Hgb] ≤9.5 g/dL; absolute reticulocyte count [ARC] ≥120×10 9/L) on Rav/Ecu &amp;gt;6 mos were randomized double-blind 2:1 to Dan or Pbo add-on therapy for 12 wks (TP1). At wk 12, Pbo arm pts switched to Dan (Pbo-Dan) and Dan arm pts continued Dan (Dan-Dan) for another 12 wks (TP2), followed by a 1-y LTE in which all pts received Dan add-on therapy. The initial Dan dose of 150 mg 3 times daily (TID) could be escalated to 200 mg TID based on clinical response at investigator discretion. Primary endpoint was change from baseline (CFB) at wk 12 in Hgb. Other secondary endpoints: proportions of pts with Hgb increase ≥2 g/dL in absence of transfusion and with transfusion avoidance through wk 24; CFB in Hgb at wk 24; and CFB in ARC, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and C3 fragment deposition on PNH red blood cells at wks 12 and 24. Safety assessments included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and laboratory abnormalities throughout the study. Results As of 20 September 2022, 86 pts were randomized; 60 completed TP2 (Dan n=40; Pbo n=20). Baseline characteristics were similar between arms ( Table). At wk 24 ( Fig), mean Hgb level was maintained in the Dan-Dan arm and increased from wk 12 in Pbo-Dan arm. ARC ( Fig) and other secondary endpoints were maintained in the Dan-Dan arm and improved in Pbo-Dan arm ( Table) at wk 24. The proportion of pts with Hgb increase of ≥2 g/dL in the absence of transfusion was maintained in the Dan-Dan arm and improved in the Pbo-Dan arm from wk 12 (Dan, 59.5%; Pbo, 0%) to wk 24 (Dan-Dan 46.3%; Pbo-Dan, 35.0%). Transfusion avoidance was maintained in the Dan-Dan arm and increased in Dan-Pbo arm from wk 12 (Dan, 83.3%; Pbo, 38.1%) to wk 24 (Dan-Dan 78.0%; Pbo-Dan, 90.0%). Mean LDH levels were maintained from wk 12 to 24 ( Table) and were near normal (&amp;lt;1.5×ULN) in both arms. Transfusions decreased in the Pbo-Dan arm from wk 12 (Pbo; mean [SD], 2.2 [2.3]) through 24 wks (Pbo-Dan; mean [SD], 0.1 [0.5]). The safety analysis included the n=80 pts exposed to Dan during the trial. At wk 24, study drug compliance was 98.8% (10.35) in the Dan-Dan arm and 98.3% (3.95) in Pbo-Dan arm. Escalation to 200 mg TID occurred for 41/57 (71.9%) pts in the Dan-Dan arm and 14/23 (60.9%) in Pbo-Dan arm. There were no deaths, meningococcal infections, or discontinuations due to hemolysis. Through data cut-off, 90% (72/80; 464 events) of pts had ≥1 TEAE after exposure to Dan. Serious AEs related to Dan were reported by 2 pts (gastrointestinal disorders/increased blood bilirubin; headache). 6 events in 4 pts led to withdrawal of study drug. 4 events were reported as breakthrough hemolysis (BTH) based on investigator discretion. Only 1 AE was associated with LDH &amp;gt;2×ULN (actual value 2.2×ULN) and potentially met the BTH definition used in other clinical studies. This AE was related to a complement-amplifying condition, COVID-19. This pt continued the study and BTH was resolved. Conclusions Danicopan as add-on to Rav or Ecu significantly improves Hgb and ARC levels and reduces the need for transfusion by addressing cs-EVH while maintaining control of IVH through 48 wks of treatment. Danicopan demonstrated a favorable benefit-risk profile with no deaths, meningococcal infections, or discontinuations due to hemolysis.

Ubrogepant for the treatment of migraine attacks during the prodrome: a phase 3, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial in the USA

Ubrogepant is a calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor antagonist that is approved for acute treatment of migraine. The prodrome is the earliest phase of a migraine attack and is characterised by non-aura symptoms that precede headache onset. The aim of this trial was to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of ubrogepant 100 mg compared with placebo for the acute treatment of migraine when administered during the prodrome. This PRODROME trial was a phase 3, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial of ubrogepant 100 mg conducted at 75 research centres and headache clinics in the USA. Eligible participants were adults aged 18-75 years who had at least a 1-year history of migraine with or without aura and a history of two to eight migraine attacks per month with moderate to severe headache in each of the 3 months before screening. Eligible participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to either receive placebo to treat the first qualifying prodrome event and ubrogepant 100 mg to treat the second qualifying prodrome event or to receive ubrogepant 100 mg to treat the first qualifying prodrome event and placebo to treat the second qualifying prodrome event. An automated interactive web-response system used permuted blocks of four to manage randomisation. All people giving interventions and assessing outcomes were masked to group assignment during the study. People doing data analysis, which occurred after study completion, were not masked to group assignment. During the double-blind treatment period, each participant was instructed to orally take two tablets of the study drug at the onset of each qualifying prodrome event. The primary endpoint was absence of moderate or severe intensity headache within 24 h after study-drug dose; efficacy analyses were conducted with the modified intention-to-treat (mITT) population, defined as all randomly assigned participants with at least one headache assessment within 24 h after taking the study drug during the treatment period. The safety population included all treated participants who took at least one administration of study drug. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04492020). Between Aug 21, 2020, and April 19, 2022, 518 participants were randomly assigned to double-blind crossover treatment. The safety population included 480 participants and the mITT population included 477 participants; 421 (88%) of 480 participants were female and 59 (12%) were male. Absence of moderate or severe headache within 24 h after a dose occurred after 190 (46%) of 418 qualifying prodrome events that had been treated with ubrogepant and after 121 (29%) of 423 qualifying prodrome events that had been treated with placebo (odds ratio 2·09, 95% CI 1·63-2·69; p<0·0001). Adverse events that occurred within 48 h after study-drug administration were reported after 77 (17%) of 456 qualifying prodrome events that had been treated with ubrogepant and after 55 (12%) of 462 events that had been treated with placebo. Ubrogepant was effective and well tolerated for the treatment of migraine attacks when taken during the prodrome. AbbVie.

Abstract 15115: Efficacy and Safety of miR-132 Inhibitor CDR132L in Patients With Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction After Myocardial Infarction: Rationale for and Design of the HF-REVERT Trial

Background: Inhibition of miR-132 effectively prevents and reverses heart failure (HF) in relevant models, making it an attractive HF target. CDR132L is a synthetic antisense oligonucleotide (ASO) selectively blocking miR-132. Translational in vitro and in vivo studies have demonstrated meaningful efficacy of CDR132L on left ventricular (LV) structure and function. CDR132L was safe and well tolerated in a Phase 1b study in chronic HF patients. The indicative effects of the miR-132 inhibitor CDR132L may be particularly beneficial in patients with active adverse remodelling, e.g. after acute myocardial infarction with early decline in ejection fraction. These patients have been relatively understudied and therapeutic options are limited. Method: The HF-REVERT (P h ase 2, Multicenter, Randomized, Parallel, 3-arm, Placebo-controlled Study to Assess E f ficacy and Safety of CD R 132L in Pati e nts with Reduced Left V entricular E jection F r ac t ion (≤ 45%) after Myocardial Infarction; NCT05350969) is a proof-of-concept study to evaluate the efficacy of CDR132L in improving cardiac function and safety in patients with reduced LV ejection fraction (LVEF). HF-REVERT aims to assess the efficacy and safety of 5 mg/kg and 10 mg/kg CDR132L, given as 3 single intravenous doses administered 28 days apart as an add-on to standard-of-care treatment, in a larger cohort of patients (N = 280) with HF and reduced LVEF (≤ 45%) after MI with a follow-up of 10 months. Key inclusion criteria are the diagnosis of acute STEMI/NSTEMI and the development of systolic dysfunction (LVEF ≤ 45%) after MI index event and elevated N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP). The study consists of a 6-month double-blind treatment period with a read out of the primary endpoint LVESVI (left ventricular end systolic volume index) followed by a 6-month open label observation period. Discussion: The HF-REVERT trial currently tests CDR132L in patients with MI and systolic dysfunction. This trial may therefore underpin the concept of miR-132 inhibition to prevent/reverse cardiac remodeling in HF patients. The results will inform the design of a subsequent outcome trial to test the effect of CDR132L in HF patients.

Short-term effects of canagliflozin on glucose and insulin responses in insulin dysregulated horses: A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, study.

Decreasing hyperinsulinemia is crucial in preventing laminitis in insulin dysregulated (ID) horses. Complementary pharmacological treatments that efficiently decrease postprandial hyperinsulinemia in ID horses are needed. Compare short-term effects of canagliflozin vs placebo on glucose and insulin responses to an oral sugar test (OST) as well as the effects on body weight and triglyceride concentrations in horses with ID. Sixteen privately-owned ID horses. A single-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel design study. The horses were randomized (ratio 1:1) to either once daily PO treatment with 0.6 mg/kg canagliflozin or placebo. The study consisted of an initial 3-day period for obtaining baseline data, a 3-week double-blind treatment period at home, and a 3-day follow-up period similar to the initial baseline period but with continued double-blind treatment. Horses were subjected to an 8-sample OST in the morning of the third day on both visits. Maximal geometric least square (LS) mean insulin concentration (95% confidence interval [CI]) during the OST decreased after 3 weeks of canagliflozin treatment compared with placebo (83.2; 55.4-125.0 vs 215.2; 143.2-323.2 μIU/mL). The geometric LS mean insulin response (insulin AUC0-180 ) for canagliflozin-treated horses was >66% lower compared with placebo. Least square mean body weight decreased by 11.1 (4-18.1) kg and LS mean triglyceride concentrations increased by 0.99 (0.47-1.5) mmol/L with canagliflozin treatment. Canagliflozin is a promising drug for treatment of ID horses that requires future studies.

The Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Evinacumab in Patients With Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia

BackgroundHomozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH) is characterized by early-onset atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease due to the high low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) burden. Patients with null-null low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) variants respond poorly, if at all, to statins and proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors, which act by upregulating LDLR expression. The 24-week double-blind treatment period (DBTP) of the phase 3 ELIPSE HoFH (Evinacumab Lipid Studies in Patients with Homozygous Familial hypercholesterolemia; NCT03399786) study demonstrated significant LDL-C reductions in patients with HoFH; LDL-C reductions were also observed in those with null-null LDLR mutations. ObjectivesThe purpose of this study was to evaluate longer-term efficacy and safety of evinacumab in patients with HoFH from the ELIPSE HoFH study. MethodsPatients with HoFH on stable lipid-lowering therapies (LLTs) ± lipoprotein apheresis and screening LDL-C ≥70 mg/dL who completed the DBTP entered the 24-week open-label treatment period (OLTP) and received intravenous evinacumab 15 mg/kg every 4 weeks. OLTP results were summarized descriptively. ResultsA total of 64 patients completed the DBTP and received open-label evinacumab. Despite multiple LLTs, the mean baseline LDL-C at DBTP entry was 250.5 ± 162.3 mg/dL. From baseline to week 48 (end of OLTP), evinacumab reduced mean LDL-C by 46.3% (mean reduction, 134.3 ± 117.3 mg/dL), with similar mean LDL-C reductions for patients with null-null (47.2%) and non-null variants (45.9%). Adverse events occurred in 47 (73.4%) patients; 4 (6.3%) patients experienced adverse events considered evinacumab-related (drug hypersensitivity, infusion-related reaction and asthenia, generalized pruritis, and muscle spasms). ConclusionsIn patients with HoFH, evinacumab demonstrated substantial and sustained LDL-C reduction regardless of LDLR function, and was generally well tolerated.

Fotagliptin monotherapy with alogliptin as an active comparator in patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial

BackgroundDipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i) have become firmly established in treatment algorithms and national guidelines for improving glycemic control in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).To report the findings from a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 clinical trial, which was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of a novel DPP-4 inhibitor fotagliptin in treatment-naive patients with T2DM.MethodsPatients with T2DM were randomized to receive fotagliptin (n = 230), alogliptin (n = 113) or placebo (n = 115) at a 2:1:1 ratio for 24 weeks of double-blind treatment period, followed by an open-label treatment period, making up a total of 52 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was to determine the superiority of fotagliptin over placebo in the change of HbA1c from baseline to Week 24. All serious or significant adverse events were recorded.ResultsAfter 24 weeks, mean decreases in HbA1c from baseline were -0.70% for fotagliptin, -0.72% for alogliptin and -0.26% for placebo. Estimated mean treatment differences in HbA1c were -0.44% (95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.62% to -0.27%) for fotagliptin versus placebo, and -0.46% (95% CI: -0.67% to -0.26%) for alogliptin versus placebo, and 0.02% (95%CI: -0.16% to 0.19%; upper limit of 95%CI < margin of 0.4%) for fotagliptin versus alogliptin. So fotagliptin was non-inferior to alogliptin. Compared with subjects with placebo (15.5%), significantly more patients with fotagliptin (37.0%) and alogliptin (35.5%) achieved HbA1c < 7.0% after 24 weeks of treatment. During the whole 52 weeks of treatment, the overall incidence of hypoglycemia was low for both of the fotagliptin and alogliptin groups (1.0% each). No drug-related serious adverse events were observed in any treatment group.ConclusionsIn summary, the study demonstrated improvement in glycemic control and a favorable safety profile for fotagliptin in treatment-naive patients with T2DM.Trial registrationClinicalTrail.gov NCT05782192.

Tafolecimab in Chinese patients with non-familial hypercholesterolemia (CREDIT-1): a 48-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial

Tafolecimab, a fully human proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) monoclonal antibody developed for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia, demonstrated robust lipid-lowering efficacy and favorable safety in previous short-term studies. We aimed to assess the long-term efficacy and safety of tafolecimab in Chinese non-familial hypercholesterolemia (non-FH) patients. Non-FH patients at high or very-high cardiovascular risk with screening low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level ≥1.8mmol/L or non-FH patients with screening LDL-C level ≥3.4mmol/L and on stable lipid-lowering therapy for at least 4 weeks, were randomized in a 2:2:1:1 ratio to receive subcutaneous tafolecimab 450mg Q4W, tafolecimab 600mg Q6W, placebo 450mg Q4W, or placebo 600mg Q6W, respectively, in the 48-week double-blind treatment period. The primary endpoint was the percent change from baseline to week 48 in LDL-C levels. A total of 618 patients were randomized and 614 patients received at least one dose of tafolecimab (n=411) or placebo (n=203). At week 48, tafolecimab induced significant reductions in LDL-C levels (treatment differences versus placebo [on-treatment estimand]:-65.0% [97.5% CI:-70.2%,-59.9%] for 450mg Q4W;-57.3% [97.5% CI:-64.0%,-50.7%] for 600mg Q6W; both P<0.0001). Significantly more patients treated with tafolecimab achieved ≥50% LDL-C reductions, LDL-C < 1.8mmol/L, and LDL-C < 1.4mmol/L than placebo group at both dose regimens (all P<0.0001). Furthermore, tafolecimab significantly reduced non-HDL-C, apolipoprotein B, and lipoprotein(a) levels. The most commonly-reported treatment emergent adverse events in the tafolecimab groups included upper respiratory infection, urinary tract infection and hyperuricemia. Tafolecimab dosed at 450mg Q4W and 600mg Q6W was safe and showed superior lipid-lowering efficacy versus placebo, providing a novel treatment option for Chinese hypercholesterolemia patients. This study was sponsored by Innovent Biologics, Inc.

Association of folic acid dosage with circulating unmetabolized folic acid in Chinese adults with H-type hypertension: a multicenter, double-blind, randomized controlled trial.

There is growing concern regarding elevated levels of circulating unmetabolized folic acid (UMFA) due to excessive intake of folic acid (FA). However, no randomized clinical trial has been conducted to examine the FA-UMFA dose-response relationship. This study aimed to investigate the FA-UMFA dose-response relationship in Chinese adults with hypertension and elevated homocysteine (H-type hypertension), a population with clear clinical indication for FA treatment. The data for this study were derived from a randomized, double-blind, multicenter clinical trial of 8 FA dosages on efficacy of homocysteine (Hcy) lowering. The parent trial had three 3 stages: screening period (2-10 days), run-in period (0-2 weeks, baseline visit), and double-blind treatment period (8 weeks) with follow-up visits at the end of the 2nd, 4th, 6th, and 8th weeks of treatment. Participants were randomly assigned to 8 treatment groups corresponding to FA dosages of 0, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, 1.2, 1.6, 2.0 mg to 2.4 mg. This study included 1,567 Chinese adults aged ≥45 years with H-type hypertension. There was a positive but non-linear association between FA supplementation and UMFA levels in the dosage range of 0 mg to 2.4 mg. In the regression analysis, the coefficients for the linear and quadratic terms of FA dosage were both statistically significant (P < 0.001). Notably, the slope for UMFA was greater for FA dosages >0.8 mg (ß = 11.21, 95% CI: 8.97, 13.45) compared to FA dosages ≤0.8 mg (ß = 2.94, 95% CI: 2.59, 3.29). Furthermore, FA dosages higher than 0.8 mg did not confer additional benefits in terms of increasing 5-methyl tetrahydrofolic acid (5-MTHF, active form of folate) or reducing homocysteine (Hcy). In Chinese adults with H-type hypertension, this study showed a positive, non-linear, dosage-response relationship between FA supplementation ranging from 0 to 2.4 mg and circulating UMFA levels. It revealed that 0.8 mg FA is an optimal dosage in terms of balancing efficacy (increasing 5-MTHF and lowering Hcy) while minimizing undesirable elevation of UMFA. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03472508?term=NCT03472508&draw=2&rank=1, identifier NCT03472508.